Trading Failed Flag Formations
Posted in Currency Analysis, GBPJPY, CHFJPY on September 12th, 2006Not all flag formations work out the way as planned. This really isn’t saying anything profound.
However, just as each flag formation has a break point where we know it is likely to continue in the direction of the flag pole it EQUALLY has an opposing break point where when its opposing break point is broken we will see the market retrace back to the start of the pole.
But trading the inverse break does take some knack.
First, we need to know where this break point exists. As a general rule most flag break points occur around the 50% mark of the flag pole, however, experienced traders can sometimes pinpoint earlier entry points and one of these earlier entry points is where the second peak/trough occurs during the consolidation/flag period.
In the case of the GBPJPY and CHFJPY formations yesterday I identified the second peak in both charts. I knew that if these prices were broken it would end the flag formation for how it should normally be traded (being in the direction of the pole).
But what would’ve happened if we’d traded the inverse break?
Entry for the inverse break would’ve been at a move above the 218.31 (+ spread) point, with stops being difficult to place but are generally placed at the low of the flag pole (now can you see why it’s important to have the flag stay within the pole’s range, if we have wicks passing through the extreme it’s hard to not only find entry, but also where to place stops on the inverse). Our target would’ve been the other extreme of the pole being 220.34 which hasn’t been reached on the GBPJPY yet.
On the other chart - the CHFJPY - we would have had entry at the break point of 93.75 (+ spread), with stops either at the low of the flag pole or at the low of the wick that pierced the flag pole’s low. Interestingly the CHFJPY hit its target, being the high of the flag pole at 94.68 (just under 90 pips made).
What tell tale signs were there that the CHFJPY was MORE probable to achieve its target than the GBPJPY?